INTED2020 Valencia

I managed to get to Valencia for INTED2020 on 1 March, before the lockdown! A really interesting conference (with 500 presenters from 30 countries), especially because of the high number of presenters from Russia, Latvia, and other Eastern European countries. Super exchange of ideas on ICT in education. Same time every year. I encourage youContinue reading “INTED2020 Valencia”

Defining Critical Internet Literacy (Literacy, 2018)

I’m pleased to finally see my article on Critical Internet Literacy published in the print issue of Literacy, after a nine-month wait! Thanks to Ber Dwyer, Julie Coiro, Jill Castek and Don Leu for leading all of us in this important area. Defining and seeking to identify critical Internet literacy: a discourse analysis of fifth‐graders’Continue reading “Defining Critical Internet Literacy (Literacy, 2018)”

Are Computers, Smartphones, and the Internet a Boon or a Barrier for the Weaker Reader?

Here is a link to a copy of my recent paper inThe Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. Harrison 2016 Boon or Barrier? In a nutshell, I argue that online reading is good for boys, in that they don’t think of online reading as about ‘books’, but on the down side, boys may find onlineContinue reading “Are Computers, Smartphones, and the Internet a Boon or a Barrier for the Weaker Reader?”

Reading Achievement, International Comparisons, and Moral Panic: Do International Reading Test Scores Matter?

Here’s the first paragraph of my recent article in JAAL – click on the link below to go to the full article. Thanks! Moral panic about reading achievement appears to afflict most English-speaking nations from time to time, and when this occurs, stories of a decline in achievement appear regularly in the media. Referring toContinue reading “Reading Achievement, International Comparisons, and Moral Panic: Do International Reading Test Scores Matter?”

Unpublishing 101 – fake journals and the grey economy of open access publishing

In this ‘post-truth world’, fake journals are beginning to become a serious nuisance. Open-access publication now operates in a kind of academic parallel universe, with over 2000 predatory and exploitative publishers, author fees up to $3,700, automatic acceptance of papers, contrived metrics, fake (or partly-fake) review boards, fake conferences, and bogus proofreading services (for whichContinue reading “Unpublishing 101 – fake journals and the grey economy of open access publishing”